Quote from: PrimeNumber7 on July 12, 2019, 06:23:06 AM

What did you report the posts for? Low/no value posts?

I don't think the person can write very well English, but he is adding something to the conversation. I think if he used better grammar, you would have a better opinion on the posts. The mods don't remove posts for having bad grammar so long as what is being written is coherent.

It makes no sense to me how those posts are valid. I included the post numbers in there for a reason.

Here's the facet that I'm trying to show with my numerical point: if a very general thread (i.e. Do you need cash for everyday use?) already has already 400 replies... enough has been said.

If you're not going to enter the topic with a nuanced reply then all you have are bland, repetitious posts.

For example, let's break down the first one:

Quote from: wahyu wida on June 10, 2019, 12:53:29 AM

Quote from: DreamStage on June 10, 2019, 12:14:54 AM

Yeah sure i use cash for everyday usage if i have to, to pay bills, some real life goods or anything else related to a daily life scenario.
In case there are no available crypto payment methods you will still need to use fiat (cash).

Anyway i find your project quite interesting actually. Will take a closer look when it's started within your 16 days countdown.

so do I, where cash is needed in my country. to meet daily needs, pay bills, or eat at a restaurant, fiat money is used. there has been no breakthrough from the government to announce the legalization of crypto use as a means of payment

Read over DreamStage's quote... then read wahyu wida's. It's nearly identical.

"Yeah sure i use cash for everyday use if i have to" - DreamStage
"so do I, where cash is needed in my country, to meet daily needs" - wahyu wida

"to pay bills, some real life goods, or anything else" - DreamStage
"pay bills, or eat at a restaurant" - wahyu wida

"In case there are no available crypto payment methods you will still need to use fiat (cash)" - DreamStage
"fiat money is used." - wahyu wida

The only extra part that wahyu added was the point: "there has been no breakthrough from the government to announce the legalization of crypto as a means of payment"

Wow, what padding! And vagueness compiled with falsities. You can analyze it further but there's no sense in using a microscope to check out a turd.

I could extract some post from before wahyu posted that says the exact same thing but that would be time better suited to reporting more.