Quote from: bones261 on July 12, 2019, 05:10:22 PM

Quote from: BTCGamblePro on July 12, 2019, 04:34:37 PM

Quote from: el kaka22 on July 12, 2019, 04:02:18 PM

I know you think you can prove something that would show how your system could win all the time and never bust but the ones here that know mathematics know that it is mathematically impossible and will never believe you over science. I mean it is just so simple, there is house edge hence there is always a chance to bust, nothing more and nothing less, you can't make up stuff that will suddenly turn that house edge into zero or positive for the gambler, there is no way.

You can explain the way you claim it will work, you can explain why you think your "AI" (which is machine learning not AI, AI is literally human like minds, not machine learning) could over come the odds and make money but in the end it will all be for nothing because not a single word you type will be believable for anyone that knows even a bit of math.

I dont understand all of you that accept the fact thay there is not way to make money in long term gambling.

Its like if you guys enjoy to give your bitcoin to those bias provably fair casino.

If you are good with that, insane... , but if you like to gamble but are tired to loss, then my platform is here to help you get an extra source of income long term.

Look like all of you like to loss and accept this fact.. better stop to gamble IMO

Your claims are rather extraordinary. Therefore, us skeptical gamblers are going to need more proof than just taking your word for it. (Which we are not going to get, since your proof would probably involve valuable secrets you don't want others to copy, if true.)Also, your free trial period is not long enough for a casual gambler to get a large enough sample to verify with a high level of certainty that the results are sound. Somehow, your algorithm has to have the capability to detect some kind of bias in the results of the game, in a reasonable number of trials, and the bias has to be big enough that it can be used to overcome the casino's advantage. If all your algorithm is doing is implementing a convoluted version of a martingale betting strategy, coupled with bankroll management, in the end, it is not going to work.
Perhaps if your program focused on games that were not randomly generated, with the new results independent of the previous results, it would have more credence. Otherwise, the dice have no memory nor does the roulette wheel.

You are totally right and we know all ththe facts too.

Martingale is the worst progression ever and does not work, there are some better progression yes but they will all fail if you are basing your strategy only in a progression because not matter how good its it will not overcome the house edge, the only way to so it is increasing your bet selection prediction.

A winning strategy need the following:

Flat bet/progression + bet selection + money management

Let me explaine you what we had done:

We had develope a custom hybrid progresion that use flat bet, positive and negative trend, which means that your balance will increase and decrease in the midle of the session.

For bet selection our algorithm increase the Accuracy of the results enought to overcome house edge.

For money management we had set 200 units as min capital and Stop Loss feature to not let you loss more than 20% of your capital in a bad session.

We had work very hard to provide you with a winning gambling system and i think that 1 week is annough time to evaluate the results, because lets be frank have you ever gamble for 1 week and had continue winning without lossing money for the whole week ?

Isnt it enought a 1 week TST? Have you ever TST a gamble system that can hold for 1 week ?

To the people not interesting, continue lossing and move on please.

Thanks