Quote from: bones261 on July 12, 2019, 06:48:54 PM

Quote from: BTCGamblePro on July 12, 2019, 05:50:22 PM

You are totally right and we know all ththe facts too.

Martingale is the worst progression ever and does not work, there are some better progression yes but they will all fail if you are basing your strategy only in a progression because not matter how good its it will not overcome the house edge, the only way to so it is increasing your bet selection prediction.

A winning strategy need the following:

Flat bet/progression + bet selection + money management

Let me explaine you what we had done:

We had develope a custom hybrid progresion that use flat bet, positive and negative trend, which means that your balance will increase and decrease in the midle of the session.

For bet selection our algorithm increase the Accuracy of the results enought to overcome house edge.

For money management we had set 200 units as min capital and Stop Loss feature to not let you loss more than 20% of your capital in a bad session.

We had work very hard to provide you with a winning gambling system and i think that 1 week is annough time to evaluate the results, because lets be frank have you ever gamble for 1 week and had continue winning without lossing money for the whole week ?

Isnt it enought a 1 week TST? Have you ever TST a gamble system that can hold for 1 week ?

To the people not interesting, continue lossing and move on please.

Thanks

I'm not certain how your algorithm is supposed to detect a sufficient bias using a "positive or negative" trend. The next result in a dice game is not dependent on what happened in any of the previous results, unless there is some kind of flaw in the random number generator. (Unlike a card game where the cards are not shuffled, which is dependent on previous results since the same card can't be dealt twice.) With live casino roulette, it is possible to get a reasonable calculation on where the ball will land to overcome bias, while the ball and wheel are in motion and bets are still being allowed. However, It does not appear that your program is capable of detecting such things and making the needed calculation.
Also, I do not think the casual gambler is going to have enough sessions to detect a bias near the middle of a particular session. This appears especially true when it appears that your program requires the user to manually input the results. In order to detect a bias, you would need a large sample size, probably in the billions, and that is being overly generous.

I'm not certain how your algorithm is supposed to detect a sufficient bias using a "positive or negative" trend

Randon results are not linear thats why you seen to perfomance very well and sometime your strategy suck, we had study randomness for more than 10 years and had set all the parameters to bet professionally.

Yes, result are independent and you cant never guess the results everytime but When you are predicting the result you cant be wrong all the time too, our prediction AI is part of the strategy but there is more involve that complement the system.

However, It does not appear that your program is capable of detecting such things and making the needed calculation.

It does all the calcularion and tell you where to bet and how much.

it appears that your program requires the user to manually input the results. In order to detect a bias, you would need a large sample size, probably in the billions, and that is being overly generous.

It does not work like that , from the first bet the platform tell you where to bet and the clients just press win or loss and thats it.

Check out this video how to use the platform:

https://youtu.be/mIErwzt1-mQ