Quote from: JollyGood on July 18, 2019, 12:22:11 PM

Quote from: AdolfinWolf on July 18, 2019, 11:57:04 AM

Quote from: JollyGood on July 18, 2019, 11:44:33 AM

Why did Valerii Solodovnyk choose Estonia rather than Ukraine for this scam?

That could be quite easily explained: Better crypto regulation, lower taxes, less interference from goverment, better business climate. (Not sure if you've noticed but there's kind of a civil war going on in the Ukraine.)

Not defending P2PB2B, but this isn't necessarily a red flag.

Sure you are right it is not necessarily a red flag but the intricate web of layer upon layer of off-shore ownership in Belize and Seychelles and actively hiding that fact - while claiming it is owned by a London based company with a headquarter office when it is a mailing address that 801 other companies use for the same purpose? That might not also be a red flag

Add to that when pressed for answer P2PB2B claim to have shared the same development team in the "early stages" but claim P2PB2B are not affiliated in any way to Coinsbit. Having said that, both made identical very recent changes to their respective websites yet claim not to use the same developers.

They shared the same nameservers pointing to the same place and only changed them after I pointed out in the Coinsbit thread they were linked.

Individually they might not be raising red flags but when all put together,for me they raise a lot of concern at the very least and red flags at the most.

I read the explanation P2PB2B offered to disassociate themselves from Coinsbit but I do not buy it at all. It seems a classic scam where they left a trail behind and are now trying to show are not linked.

It is your right to associate us with whatever you desire including killing Kennedy. We understand that conspiracy theories are the effective way to pump your account.
We will not refute your comments related to recent updates identical to Coinsbit for one simple reason - it is part of obvious manipulation.
Even if being true your assumption (identical updates on different exchanges) doesn't mean scam intentions - at least for prudent people.
If you accuse somebody in scam intentions groundless (or with grounds like because the sky is blue) please remember - everyone judges people according to how they see themselves.
You let everyone know that you're manipulator and the chief source of fud but it isn't really a problem for anonymous, right?