Quote from: No HATE on July 20, 2019, 01:59:24 AM

Is there any difference if I wear their signature without receiving money?
So, am I not allowed to wear a signature of the site I love even if they have scam accusations?

That's the point. I doubt anyone would do that if it wasn't because they are getting paid to close their eyes and pretend it's ok to announce Livecoin. I'm pretty sure most of them would be against them if it wasn't for that. Which means that in this case money > opinions/reputation.

If you genuinely think Livecoin is good, then you can advertise all you want (unless they go full scam mode, which wouldn't be ok just like isn't ok to advertise an obvious Bitcoin doubler/ponzi). Right now, I (and many members) don't trust them. And I don't think even 1% of the candidates on their campaign actually trust them, which means they must only be doing it for the money.

Quote from: No HATE on July 20, 2019, 01:59:24 AM

Scam accusations doesn't prove them to be scam, and people think they didn't respond, of course they do, but you are just not satisfied.
Therefore, things should not be settled here, it should be in the court, tag should be "active scam accusation" or "shady exchange" but not a scammer.

The accusation is still open. I haven't declared that they are a scam and should be tagged/banned/arrested. And that's why I didn't tag them or any of the signature participants. I just don't trust them and have a feeling they had bad intentions with the user from the accusation.

Quote from: No HATE on July 20, 2019, 01:59:24 AM

But let's not focus on that since we have a scam accusation thread for that and we can never resolve that since it's a technical or probably a legal issue.

There is also the way they behavied - their answers, their shit ToS and how they blocked someone's account and keep deleting posts just because someone said something against them. Is this what a trusted exchange would do?

Quote from: No HATE on July 20, 2019, 01:59:24 AM

So other site I've mentioned aren't bad (red trust)? but we allow them to have exposure, that's fair because they are still operating and not proven to be a scam website at least at the court of law.

Aren't we still allowing Livecoin to run their campaign? Yobit is the only other case I know from the sites you mentioned above, and they are completley shit. But I don't think I would agree with tagging someone soleny for advertising them. Tagging someone and not trusting them are two very different things.

Quote from: No HATE on July 20, 2019, 01:59:24 AM

Everyone does, DTs remarks are based on their personal opinion only.

This doesn't change the fact that people still announce shady websites just for money. Making them untrustworthy in my eyes. Good people don't put money over principles and values. And to me, someone with principles wouldn't advetise them.