Quote from: itcoinbay on July 20, 2019, 11:07:31 PM

Here is what we are starting to suspect/realize: All of you petty little naysayers, detractors and false accusers are either owners of, employed by, or working for escrow services or exchanges and you simply can't afford for people to come to the realization that they don't need you. People are so accustomed to banks or someone else controlling their finances and now someone (we) comes along and says "hey, we don't need no stinking third parties" and this is a major threat to the status quo of banks and financial controls.

The more criticism we receive, the more we become convinced that this is the business model that we should continue to pursue. Your attacks are completely generic and incoherent. You refuse to read our responses which completely overwhelm your small-minded and senseless attacks. If every single member of bitcointalk criticizes us, it is not a deterrent to us, but rather an encouragement. It would be one thing if your arguments had validity, but they are baseless and foolish and your pointless arguments only work to reveal your true nature (again, only speaking to our detractors). We have never done anything underhanded to anyone and I challenge everyone to prove otherwise, but here it seems you are guilty until proven innocent. And how the fuck do you prove anything with a bunch of illiterate inbreds that have no comprehension except to parrot the same shit over and over (it's like deja vu all over again) despite any evidence or argument to the contrary? "She's a witch, burn 'er!"

Some people are simply too stupid to argue with. The sad thing here is that those of you that this applies to do not have the capacity to understand it.

So, you have not changed your mind instead you are blaming the entire community here and abusing them textually. Above few responses form malevolent also does not mean that he is vouching for you. Which means you have not established any credibility here so that users can trust you and spend 0.01BTC in your site upfront to buy the membership (which they may not need anyway) and you will send them 0.02BTC in return.

Go to the scam accusations section you will see how many topic we have from the victims who lost their money because the service wanted them to deposit some amount of money before they withdraw
Go to lending section you will see people are creating new accounts and their first post is asking a no collateral loan. Easy money if it works right?
Go to scam accusations section again, you will see loan defaulters - even some of them have somehow established accounts here

It is very easy so scam people in this forum because you are hiding behind a username.

I gave you much time, I wanted you to realize your mistake here. I left you two proposals:
Change the way you doing now
or
Or find an escrow and secure the money first. Don't play trust.

I also gave you 24 hours to correct yourself but you failed and continuing to blame others.

Quote from: Pamoldar on July 20, 2019, 07:56:11 AM

This is completely a very wrong approach OP. I will highly advice to change it. If you really want to go this way then do this:

1. Find an escrow
2. Deposit the BTC to the escrow
3. Run this contest/offer. Users will feel more comfortable.

I am giving you 24 hours time either to change the terms of buying membership and then you will pay or do an escrow. If you fail then I will tag your account.

Time is up, I am going to tag you and this tag will be only removed if:
1. malevolent vouch for you and ensures the community that if they risk their money upfront they will not lose the money.
or
2. By any chance if anyone takes your offer and they really get the money you promised to give them back. After few months of observation I will remove my tag. (Don't dare to create a new account and fake the process)

By the way, if my mind is not clear against you then I still may keep my tag even if you fulfill any of above. This is just to keep myself safe from the unexpected blackmail you may try on me.

Good luck with this hope that you prove me wrong. Nothing personal here.

Archived