Quote from: No HATE on July 20, 2019, 02:09:35 PM

Quote from: electronicash on July 20, 2019, 02:03:14 PM

don't you think this is becoming centralize already? livecoin has issues, its up to them to solve it but i think a warning to those participant of the campaign that they are helping a company that has an open accusation is enough. but tagging look a bit harsh. they are just same as me or anyone trying to earn few btc per week. just stating my opinion though its all still in your hands.

You are right, of all the DT, it's weird that Hhampuz is the one tagging participants after he benefited from livecoin campaign, isn't it unethical?
But forget about that, he is misusing the trust system here like he doesn't care of the effect to the community and to the DTs who trusted him.

Quote from: Little Mouse on July 20, 2019, 02:06:42 PM

Anyway, I also think that negative tag for this reason isn't appropriate.

So we are in the same side here.

Quote from: Little Mouse on July 20, 2019, 02:06:42 PM

Hhampuz is giving them a warning because in Livecoin thread it's not possible to warn them, they are deleting the response.

Giving a warning by reg tagging? Did you hear yourself?

Quote from: Little Mouse on July 20, 2019, 02:06:42 PM

Hhampuz also admitted to remove the tag.

For a certain condition which is to withdraw the application? Who is he? Did he own the forum?
He made unreasonable judgement but he can correct that by removing the negged trust and just make his own blacklist.

they all have the right to mark red to them. its harsh but its just how it goes, those participants can quit the livecoin campaign if they don't wanna be tagged. seem like an ultimatum is being posted already. they can remain in the campaign but the risk is there. an account here in bitcointalk is very important, they'd rather be joining the IEO campaign than those companies with issues if they don't wanna be at risk.