Quote from: bones261 on July 20, 2019, 03:36:15 PM

Quote from: The Pharmacist on July 20, 2019, 03:25:13 PM

I'm a bit confused as to how much of a scam exchange Livecoin is. I supported the flag based on the evidence presented, and I'm fairly confident in doing that, but it sounds to me like it's an exchange that has scammy aspects to it much like Yobit does and that not everyone has problems or gets scammed. Like I said, they do sound worse than Yobit but who knows. And again, I wouldn't target the campaign participants with negative trust. If Yahoo62278 blacklists them, that's pretty good disincentive for them not to join the Livecoin campaign.

I think it is a good disincentive too for Yahoo62278. However, a legendary member can earn .01925 BTC per week off of that campaign. Not as good paying as the chipmixer campaign, but still pretty good. Some people may not give 2 shits about any blacklist or tagging with that kind of pay. Also, to be fair to Livecoin, I think Yobit is definitely worse. Yobit has way more listings of dead and broken coins, or coins on the wrong chain. However, I don't think Yobit will freeze an account if you dis them on the internet....

Enough for the scam accusations discussion as that has been discuss many times. I brought this topic here as I believe more exchanges or gambling sites will have a scam accusation in the future, regardless on how it looks, a scam accusation is a scam accusation and I appreciate some DTs who have a good judgement to the campaign participants which is not to tag them.

Yahoo's move is good but Hhampuz is unacceptable, the moment he knows the campaign has a scam accusation, he didn't stop the campaign immediately and waited until he got his pay, then stop it to play safe.

If DTs are not tagging sportsbet, yobit, and bitcasino, why would livecoin is treated not the same way?

If you trusted a member to be part of the DT, his decision affects your reputation too, so it should be resolve.

Trust is very important to campaign participants, as it's part of the requirement of the campaign, and it's never happening that a campaign participants possess risk or will scam money as most of them don't trade, they are just here to participate in the forum and earn if possible.

Quote from: Findingnemo on July 20, 2019, 03:29:25 PM

When someone supporting scam activities with their knowledge then it can also be considered under your definition.You can ask the same question to red trust queen and what answer you will get. Cheesy

So sportsbet, yobit, and bitcasino participants are supporting scam sites? and how do we treat them? Why aren't they treated like livecoin's participants?