Quote from: DarkStar_ on July 22, 2019, 01:17:18 AM

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on July 22, 2019, 01:10:23 AM

Wont let me quote from that thread but this is post #2081 in the thread you linked written by Stunna-

The BitCasino claim is valid to my knowledge and BitCasino handled it very poorly. Do you really believe that it's okay for BitCasino to steal 20 BTC from a customer because he bet too high? There was no software restriction and it was buried in the T&C. It's technically legal but incredibly shady and unethical. I'm guessing it's technically legal for LiveCoin to not allow withdraws of specific coins due to wallet issues.

I get that you're wearing a BitCasino signature and feel the need to defend them, but BitCasino has done wrong in the past. Stunna's claims were valid regardless of anything else.

There should have been software restriction, that isnt cool. Unfortunately fir the affected user T&Cs are legally binding.
Like you said bitcasino are much improved now thankfully & have a good rating on Ask Gamblers which should reassure people.

Unfortunately for LiveCoin I think theyd struggle to wriggle out with the wallet software excuse as thatd be very difficult to prove in a court of law unlike the T&C issue with the old bitcasino problem because T&Cs are in writing, black & white.

@No HATE - Can i just add that I dont agree with the red tagging of Livecoin campaign participants.
I like Hhampuz a lot but on this issue I disagree with him.