Quote from: Alex-11 on July 22, 2019, 11:23:40 PM

IMO the goal should be not to trade after MA's blog posts but only after Socrates numbers itself. Trading should be done completely independent of his advise or opinion.
Blog posts can be used for educational purpose, but not mainly for trading decisions.

backtest I've posted already several times: http://armstrong.forumprofi.de/showthread.php?tid=78&pid=234#pid234

The system is not everywhere buggy, but I can understand people who would rather wait until some bugs are fixed. And for people who have problems with Socrates, this would also be my advise (to wait).

Quote from: bikefront on July 22, 2019, 11:09:07 PM

And please explain how Armstrong claims that it is possible to break the laws of thermodynamics ala Japanese scooter guy.

hehe, I've no idea what you are talking about.
There are many things I can't explain, but there are a few things I can and they are enough for me. The main point is, they need to work

@Alex-11, you have no idea? Oh, you have no ideas about basic science, or you have no ideas about what we have posted about Armstrong's scooter from Japan on this forum for so many times?

Here is the raw text, by Martin Armstrong, on the perpetual machine that even generates energy:

In Tokyo, a man came to me with a magnetic engine. He wanted me to help him and take it public. He left me a scooter and told me to test it out. You plugged it in once and thereafter it self-generated power and did not need to be plugged in again. I was skeptical at first. I asked him why he was coming to me? He said he had been to all the top auto manufacturers and everyone wanted to buy it. He was offered $50 million and turned it down not because he wanted more, but because they wanted to shelve it so it would not see the light of day. That was another project they ensured was killed in my affair.

Are you not aware of the above from Armstrong, or are you not aware of the basic science?

Any people with at least one science class from high school should understand that there is NO free energy. Are you one of them or not?

Well, Martin Armstrong certainly did NOT understand, and that speaks volume AGAINST any other claims that Armstrong have made. You have two choices:

1. Believe that Armstrong was simply ignorant about the basic science, in which case, one would wonder whether he even has the intelligence to do all these "energy" model, artificial intelligence, etc. Why would anyone trust Armstrong's ability when he doesn't even have the most basic understanding of the most fundamental science.

2. Believe that Armstrong was not ignorant, but instead he LIED. In this case, given his lying record (and on many other stuffs), it is difficult to trust any of Armstrong's (hindsight) claims.

Any other choices are not logical.