Quote from: Quickseller on July 23, 2019, 05:57:09 AM

Quote from: nutildah on July 20, 2019, 06:57:10 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on July 19, 2019, 10:55:06 PM

Quote from: nutildah on July 19, 2019, 10:01:30 AM

So what? His trust rating is representative of his personal experience with the exchange. They were a good client to deal with from Hhampuz's point of view. [...]

Here is the description of a positive rating:

Quote from:

Positive - You think that this person is unlikely to scam anyone.

Having a positive trading experience does not appear to be sufficient to warrant a positive rating, according to the above description. When you leave a positive rating, you are saying the person is unlikely to scam anyone.

When it comes to handling campaign-related BTC, Livecoin never scammed anybody.

That is not the purpose of the trust system. The purpose of giving a positive rating is to vouch that the person is unlikely to scam period, there are no 'ifs thans or buts'.

You cut short the rest of my reply:

Quote from: nutildah on July 20, 2019, 06:57:10 AM

When it comes to handling campaign-related BTC, Livecoin never scammed anybody. Besides, what Livecoin did wasn't a scam. They weren't out to cheat their customers out of money.

Quote from: Quickseller on July 23, 2019, 05:57:09 AM

It is not acceptable to give positive trust to a known scammer who takes out a collateralized reputation loan, or something similar.

Again, not everyone considers Livecoin to be a "known scammer." As the 4th least trusted member on the forum, you're in no position to be talking about trust-related issues anyway.

Quote from: Quickseller on July 23, 2019, 05:57:09 AM

The issue at hand in regards to LiveCoin is not that they have an unhappy customer, it is they have profited from the trading of a coin they have no ability to process withdrawals for, and have continued doing so for over a year. Sure, they were the subject of a double spending attack on a shitty altcoin, but after they had their money stolen, they continued allowing traders to buy the coin when the exchange knew very well there was no way they could process a withdrawal request from these traders.

They were obviously holding out hope of eventually being reimbursed with MONA. Now that its clear that's not happening, they are delisting the coin. And they are currently engaging in "socializing losses" by buying back outstanding MONA, if only for a fraction of the price.