Quote from: mersal on July 24, 2019, 06:39:18 PM

Quote from: bkbirge on July 24, 2019, 06:23:15 PM

Quote from: mersal on July 24, 2019, 06:18:43 PM

But there was a movie directed in the same or previous year about landing on the moon and people claiming that the actual moon landing similar to that movie set.

It's totally true, Stanley Kubrick was contracted by NASA to make the movie of the moon landings but since he's such a perfectionist he demanded that it be filmed on location.

Any explanation for this from NASA.

All they say was why we need to lie such thing even if we do USSR might capture that we are lying.Logical but not a proof for that they landed.

100's of thousands of people worked on this project for 15+ years, if there had been a conspiracy it would have been revealed by them, or by the many outside observers. The people who question the validity of the moon landings are using magical thinking devoid of rationality, take data wildly out of context to prove unrelated 'points', and rely far more on appeal to false authority than not. Fun fact: youtube is not a research database.

Quote from: mersal on July 24, 2019, 08:20:52 PM

Quote from: bkbirge on July 24, 2019, 06:50:38 PM

Quote from: mersal on July 24, 2019, 06:39:18 PM

Quote from: bkbirge on July 24, 2019, 06:23:15 PM

Quote from: mersal on July 24, 2019, 06:18:43 PM

But there was a movie directed in the same or previous year about landing on the moon and people claiming that the actual moon landing similar to that movie set.

It's totally true, Stanley Kubrick was contracted by NASA to make the movie of the moon landings but since he's such a perfectionist he demanded that it be filmed on location.

Any explanation for this from NASA.

All they say was why we need to lie such thing even if we do USSR might capture that we are lying.Logical but not a proof for that they landed.

100's of thousands of people worked on this project for 15+ years, if there had been a conspiracy it would have been revealed by them, or by the many outside observers. The people who question the validity of the moon landings are using magical thinking devoid of rationality, take data wildly out of context to prove unrelated 'points', and rely far more on appeal to false authority than not. Fun fact: youtube is not a research database.

Could be really happened but why they didn't send any men after that first landing on the moon in 1969,it would have been a tourist spot in 2019 if they did that with the technology in 1969.

They did send more men after the first landing in 1969. 5 more missions after the first landed on the moon.
https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/lunar/apollo.html

As to why we stopped going after 1972 the answer is clear, Congress did not want to fund it anymore, the public in general lost interest. Even now there are a lot of people that think scientific research and/or learning to live off planet are unnecessary expenditures, they'd rather we spend more money on military or welfare or their own tax benefit.