Quote from: DutchFinity on July 25, 2019, 07:46:45 AM

Quote from: mirekti on July 24, 2019, 10:43:34 PM

Well, check my post #19 in this thread. I have first hand experience with this team, and it wasnt a positive one.

The crypto scene is full of lies. Projects, team members, investors, fudders; I've never seen so much dirt and filth than since I discovered crypto.

Who's the unethic one in your story? Did Stellerro act improper or are you a fudder acting improper by smearing the project with lies through his newly made Bitcointalk account? All these things happen in crypto. Can you back the things that you say with proof? Otherwise it will stay just a story.

I am not sure what Stellerro does, I just stated the fact this project was lead by the same team that lead Bitjob.
Yes, I can back my story up.

1. Look at the attached distribution table. It states 64% of tokens would be owned by contributors. Well, it wasn't as successful as planned, only few % was captured, and the rest, instead of being burned, ended up with the team.
2. Now go and check the attached roadmap, and then join their Telegram group and ask them when was the product released, and what's their future plan.
3. Many sweet words about variety of universities, even Dutch government is into it - Now go and check what universities are actually involved now and at which rate. I am not sure if there's any, but some in Israel. I don't have any numbers as they wouldn't reveal them, but you should understand my skepticism.

All in all, I just shared my experience with the team, ymmv, but don't call me a fudder.

...it seems I am not able to attach the screenshots from the white paper, but here's the link: https://www.chainwhy.com/upload/default/20180625/09609312fb22d5aa3b44f9b7425a8a5c.pdf Pages 12 and 20