Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on July 28, 2019, 03:06:15 PM

Quote from: astadbtc on July 28, 2019, 02:41:52 PM

I completely agree but do you question yourself perhaps? Do you ever wonder that you might not be contributing at all by answering whatever comes in your mind on any post you find? Because I didn't find your post by accident.

In the thread you are referring to, you provided incorrect information and I corrected you. You didn't read the link I provided and doubled down on your incorrect assumptions, so I corrected you again. You may want to reflect as to whose contribution is less useful.

Quote from: astadbtc on July 28, 2019, 02:41:52 PM

Do you also understand that the only people that leveled to the rank of Full Member are native English speakers and the rest have absolutely zero chance getting merited?

That is just categorically not true. Several of the highest merited users of all time are not native English speakers, such as LoyceV (>3000 earned merit) and micgoossens (>2000 earned merit). There are users who have earned >100 merit not only not being a native English speaker, but not even earning a single merit in any of the English speaking boards. Look at abhiseshakana for example. 1272 earned merit, and he doesn't even post on the English boards.

Yes enjoy correcting. Since you do that, you might try being in detail from your first answer though. Doesn't need to put hints and links and answering like you did. You answer ("correction") was inadequate.

Also about merit, you are referring to 3-4 exceptions. Meanwhile I'm reading bounty hunters answers in every forum post, from persons that have 100+ merit just because they were bounty hunting since 2017. Is this a just system? Why would people that don't offer anything useful have full member ranks? Just because they were lucky to have posted a hundred replies in 2017?