Quote from: tranthidung on July 31, 2019, 02:42:35 AM

Quote from: sowns on July 31, 2019, 02:23:26 AM

Does anyone else feel like that can encourage spam? How often do you see 60 quality posts a week?(I was thinking of posting this in the actual thread but Im not sure if that would constitute as spam.)

It does not a matter, in my opinion.
Bitvest campaign has run in the forum, for years, not recently.
I know there are some users in the forum, whom usually makes 100 - 120 posts per week, with high or extremely high quality, for their own interests, writing for fun (they likely have fun when they write their constructive posts, or simply for their bussiness).
For the rest, 60-post-quota per week is acceptable. I don't see issues with 9-10 posts per day, in average.

For campaign participants, if they spend enough time, and really concentrate on discussion, on what they write with decent efforts for each post, I do believe that they can make it, without issues.

The last and most important thing, is the campaign's managers. If managers are strictly controlled participants' posts with timegaps between posts (burstposting), length, contents of posts; then reject all unqualifying posts (reject payments for those posts). Yes, there will be no issues at all!

Fair enough, if they can make it then all the more power to them. Its just that we recently had an incident with Stakes signature campaign and this just made me think of that.