Quote from: Clunge on February 17, 2014, 08:48:19 PM

Quote from: cyruss322 on February 17, 2014, 05:09:26 PM

COin is firing up ! turned my shittiest day of the year so far into a great one !
FUCK YEAH ! (FuckVader)

Sorry to break this to you FV but your 4MH/s rig is hashing over 1/2 of the fuckcoin hash.

This is not good I'm afraid. It's not sustainable.

It's also unnecessary.

The same applies to anyone who thinks that pointing 100% of your hashpower at fuckcoin is a sustainable idea.

To your rescue comes quota scheduling and the "load-balance : true," line in your cgminer or sgminer conf file.

{
"pools" : [
   {
      "quota" : "9;stratum+tcp://yournormalpool.com:nnnn",
      "user" : "yourusername.1",
      "pass" : "1"
   },
   {
      "quota" : "1;stratum+tcp://pool.fuckco.in:3333",
      "user" : "yourusername.1",
      "pass" : "1"
   }
]
,
"load-balance" : true,
blah,
blah,
delete line with "failover..." if present.
-----------------------------------------------
You will continue to get 90% of your normalpool earnings plus a good slice of the fuckcoin cake.
You cannot have it all - it will turn to *** in your mouth

Think about it.

Think for a minute about what 100% fuckcoin mining does for your relationship with the devs.
Whatever YOUR hashpower, it will take US 57 days to equal their 5,000,000 premine.

I have 2% of my hashpower pointed at FC just for the brand name.
I presume they are good guys.

I will not consider pointing more until:
There is at least a functional fuckchain explorer
There is a plan for the client.
The client source code is up.
They publicly destroy the majority of the premine

That's just the start.
The devs must know that this is basically true.
It's just easier to do virtually nothing and hope for the best.

Can you explain to me why pointing all my mining power at the pool is a bad idea? I dont know the first thing about 51% attacks ! I'm making my coins and I dont see why making only 90% of what I'm making now would be a good thing if I am not a threat to the network!