Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion

Socrates is Rubbish whichever way you look at it

I get confirmation of it every half hour.

Quote from: nattybear on August 01, 2019, 02:32:35 PM

Quote from: olegrey on August 01, 2019, 02:26:19 PM

Or your phatom reversals that were debunked by the reversals being in the dashboard as pointed out by alex.

Debunked? Hardly... There is so much inconsistency across the multiple portals on the Socrates website. Indeed reversals would appear/disappear in the Reversals section, the textual commentary, and the main dashboard.

I had emailed Socrates support about this NUMEROUS times and they had no explanation nor could they suggest which one was correct. Which is exactly the reason why historical study of reversals is not adequate. Indicative perhaps. But for useful analysis it has to be future tested... Which takes us back to the same point that's been highlighted consistently... Someone just needs to show the evidence!

As you can see nobody can even tell you which source of data is correct. If the results of all my numerical analysis turn out to be wrong because the data is wrong, that does not mean that the system is good, not does it mean that my methods are wrong. You have to look at my overall expert conclusion which is NOT based on the numbers alone, and that is still spot on. It could have only been invalidated by someone demonstrating consistently winning trades posted in advance as requested here so many times. It hasn't happened so the case is closed for now.

Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for a reason.

Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud.

See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.