Quote from: Hawker on September 12, 2011, 01:51:15 PM

Quote from: AyeYo on September 12, 2011, 01:32:24 PM

Quote from: bitcoin2cash on September 12, 2011, 06:26:31 AM

Quote from: FirstAscent on September 12, 2011, 12:57:31 AM

Likewise, when I claim that the farming on your land is creating edge effects which destroy the biodiversity on my land...

So in other words, you have some use of your land that requires the use of my land? You have no right to that anymore than I have the right to build my grain silo on your land. Unless I'm directly damaging your land through some sort of border crossing, you've got no justification to tell me what I can and cannot do with my land.

You don't seem to understand the difference between magically declaring that someone has "no right" to do something and implemendation difficulties of actually being able to stop them from doing it.

bitcoin2cash's whole point is that he has abstract rights and the real world consequences of trying to implement them doesn't matter. He talks about "his land" but if you take a real world view, land ownership comes from the State so its meaningless to assert he has rights that are more important than the State.

I think in his world, his "right" to own the land comes from his ability to defend what he thinks he owns. However, as I've pointed out in a limitless number of threads, this quickly devolves into the man with the biggest gun making all the rules.