Quote from: Mk2vr6 on February 18, 2014, 01:22:47 AM

Quote from: wmvatis on February 18, 2014, 01:17:28 AM

Quote from: franky1 on February 18, 2014, 01:10:29 AM

Quote from: wmvatis on February 18, 2014, 12:14:02 AM

I voted for 20 Billion, but I realize after seeing your guys thoughts that I was just being greedy. I just wanted price to go up.

Lowering the planned supply would probably have the opposite effect because of the negative image it brings, and if we have learned anything from other coins, the honest ones have a better chance of succeeding. This coin has a similar feel to doge. It needs to be fun and friendly, people need to trust it and enjoy it.

So, I change my vote 50 billion.

how can anyone say a coin needs to be trusted, and then say change the total limit in the very next sentance. changing anything once released makes investors/users/anyone think that if you change it once whats stopping you changing it again. and the whole store of value theory is lost.

Well no, I'm saying you shouldn't change the total limit, but I think I understand what you're thinking.

It was originally 50 billion and everyone thinks its 50 billion. The dev was saying he found an error in the code that made it actually 20 billion and he was asking if he should just leave it (which would effectively be changing it) or change it to 50 billion (which would effectively be keeping it). That's the way I see it anyway.

And I agree - lets make this as honest and transparent as possible - 50Billion as originaly agreed.

If I could, I would tip you like 100k grumpycoin for supporting and agreeing (a large tip could be good). I would tip franky1 like 1 or 2 grumpycoin, cause he didn't like what I said (although I'm pretty sure it was just misunderstanding). The question is, where is the line from insulting tip to approval tip. I don't know, but it will be fun to find out!