Quote from: tbct_mt2 on August 14, 2019, 04:07:15 PM

13 posts and 7 merits. Your posts are too high quality (it seems because I don't know your local language, I guess based on what you wrote in English and length of your posts in local board). Length of post does not guarentee post quality, but it seems you made quality posts, too higher than other newbies.
I don't think you are new here. Cheesy

they always assumed that i'm not new on this forum. the truth is, i'm new in this kind forum but i already engaged in other kind of forum like educational/academe so i knew a lot of basics.

Quote from: tbct_mt2 on August 14, 2019, 04:07:15 PM

Some things managers likely consider when screening applicants to choose participants:
- Post history to check post quality
- Trust Flag history
- Language: mixture between English and local; or purely English
- Average posts per day/ week
- Inactive or active posting in recent weeks

since merits are hard to acquired, so assuming that managers are also looking for people that contains merits.

Quote from: The Pharmacist on August 14, 2019, 04:10:27 PM

Quote from: Zener Diode on August 14, 2019, 04:01:49 PM

i assumed that participants are being chose by their way of posting (correct me if there are mistakes).

There's no general answer to that, because each campaign manager has his own standards. Basically if the manager cares one whit about this forum's quality, he won't choose people who consistently make garbage posts. Unfortunately there are managers who don't care, and they have to fill up the campaign with participants--the result is that you get very low-quality posters making a huge amount of nonsensical crap posts.

The bitcoin-paying campaigns are generally run by good managers like Yahoo62278 and DarkStar_ (though they aren't the only good ones), while altcoin/token-paying bounties tend to be run by managers with low standards. At least that's my observation.

The campaign that i checked was managed by a person that you mentioned and noticed that some participants are not good at posting. Then if they knew that their participants are filled by not good participants, why do they still keep them as a participant of a campaign.