Quote from: SyGambler on August 23, 2019, 03:03:16 PM

Quote from: degen1 on August 23, 2019, 08:23:29 AM

I already know that the last deposit was clean and know that wasn't the issue, they are not disputing the deposit. There have been hundred of emails and messages by this point, but it's basically come down to that there's some allegation from a third party, but I won't be told any information or supplied any evidence. Additionally, nothing has happened outside of my communications so I have no clue what it could be right now.

Lastly, for some reason they told SBR what the allegation was, so I know that they should be capable of telling me. It is odd b/c we had a great relationship before this and they are choosing to throw out the privacy and rights of a solid customer based on some random allegation that is most likely inaccurate. I feel like I should have been given the information and the benefit of the doubt. Given that I've not violated any terms and conditions of the site itself there should be more respect, privacy, and communication.

Honestly not sure what to tell you , I fully support you but the info isn't enough and they are trying to hide the details so if I were you I wouldn't post the chat history at this point cause it may cause so you some trouble
but keep recording everything that happens behind the scenes , you may need that later

are you sure that they told SBR about what's going on ? couldn't understand from your thread honestly but if that was the case then this is really annoying
SBR is a great place but don't see a reason why they should know what's going on when you don't have a single idea about the situation

the cases against fairlay are really few , but even the last time when they accused a player of washing btc they didn't post any info regarding what happened with the BTC as I remember
IMO they don't even have the right to hold that btc even if the user was suspected to be washing

will be watching here and in SBR , please keep us updated

There is not much information I would be able to share anyways, they haven't given me much to work with, I can only outline what I've been given, and tell my opinions - whether or not readers want to believe them is up to them, but SBR has been on my side and fairly in agreement with my standpoint.

I am certain they told SBR what is going on, you can confirm on the SBR thread - the moderator there confirmed they were told what's going on conditional on a non disclosure.

Apparently they have never given a proper answer to the last case either, but I will not give up especially b/c I did not violate any of their terms and the other guy did admit he had potentially. This is very bad business and it should be recognized.