Quote from: Alex-11 on August 24, 2019, 11:43:34 PM

Quote from: AnonymousCoder on August 24, 2019, 04:08:41 PM

And BTW there should not be any distinction between Socrates and Martin Armstrong, because Martin Armstrong said that Socrates is a clone of himself:

Socrates is a Software as a Service (SaaS) platform. If Armstrong makes mistakes while reading what Socrates is writing, then it's not Socrates fault. Also Armstrong may simply be too busy to provide timely and extensive updates.
So it is definitely not a 100% clone. I don't get how you can take such a statement literally.

Thank you for pointing this out. You are clearly subscribing to this mythical idea that this Socrates contraption is infallible and that in case of prediction failure, it is only the ignorance of the people including Martin Armstrong himself who are to blame for not knowing how to use it. I suggest you read the following article:

Socrates Technical Analysis Prediction Magic
https://armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com/2019/07/socrates-technical-analysis-prediction.html

This article explains how it is the ambiguity of the information provided that lets it get away with any failure.

Then it is at the discretion of the support staff to blame the user for not understanding how Socrates works.

BTW I am having fun taking some of the stuff that Martin Armstrong writes literally. It provides me with these endless opportunities to rinse and repeat - because what needed to be written about Martin Armstrong has been written here and quite honestly, Martin Armstrong is not not such a complex character that a book could be filled about him.

You may want to listen to one of his latest interviews at

https://play.acast.com/s/53a91a47-e3e9-4cbe-8713-07ff90f5e6f9/newsvoice.podbean.com%2Fmartin-armstrong-bitcoin-is-the-biggest-money-laundering-scam-in-its-history-24b00f90dd1700f333f1ee8f1a4eedd1

"Martin Armstrong: Bitcoin is the biggest money laundering scam in its history"

You will experience his wisdom and depth of thought first hand.

He cannot even respond properly to the first question. Instead he is getting to his own case of contempt of court and all that mess which he went to jail for. Disgusting. That is when I closed the page. After his first attempt of building a sentence.

Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for a reason.

Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud.

See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.