What you wrote is Not Even Wrong. 
Youre off in left field derp.
Without decentralization, theres the potential for censorship and lack of permissionless system.
Youre off in left field derp.
Without decentralization, theres the potential for censorship and lack of permissionless system.
How?
A miner cannot censor my transaction. I do not practise address re-use... they do not know what my tx is, or who it is between. They're economically incentivised to mine it (via tx fee).
How does a large miner reduce "permissionless"?
The whole beauty of the blockchain.... is that the don't/can't. It's why the blockchain is actually good technology.
I know that you can't explain in detail how this "censorship and lack of permissionless system" actually comes about (in a way which isn't easy to point out the flaws in).... but I'd like to see you try.
Quote
Nonsense. A soft fork is not a fork because it doesnt force the hodlers of BTC to make a decision
Oh dear. Are you for real?
It is a fork in the protocol. The nodes have to decide. The hodlers are not relevant.
Quote
The dichotomy is between immutable and variable blocksize
Explain to everyone how larger/variable blocksizes make for not-immutable.
Quote
Youre lying
It's good thing that Satoshi's posts have been recorded, and people can go and see for themselves what he said.
Quote
How much more disinformation are you going to spew in this thread?
Yes... I'm not sure I can compete on that front /S .... so I will leave.
I just feel sorry for the hordes of people who have been fooled by the "centralised mining destroys trustlessness" idiocracy. You can't explain how it does that.... because it doesn't.