Quote from: ðºÞæ on August 31, 2019, 05:37:56 AM

In future you will have your work cut out sticking up for that child rape supporting judge. In legal circles its just about unheard of for a judge to retire to join the accused legal team taking with him his inside knowledge of the case. Average Joe does not take kind to this they have kids at home, just saying.

A recommendation is not a ruling.
https://youtu.be/fIbMQl895hQ
the article
https://coingeek.com/bitstocks-tv-analyzes-the-kleiman-v-wright-case-bad-news-for-btc/

Whats progress has been made with the critical vulnerabilities found in Lightning Network software where users will lose funds.

I have to quote myself again...

Quote from: Iamtutut on August 29, 2019, 07:46:40 PM

Quote from: hv_ on August 29, 2019, 07:18:21 PM

If some of the little baby trolls herein would have some balls, they could come up with their pricky faces
And try to talk their "facts" in same manner as these decent ppl are capable of.

So show us ur counter facts (lol) pls

https://www.reddit.com/r/bitcoincashSV/comments/cx0vmh/kleiman_vs_craig_wright_getting_the_facts/

Usual lies from a BSV shill.

The Court ordered Wright to reveal his holdings, he refused to. Civil contempt of Court, Judge decides to use article 37B for proceeding.

Kleiman Estate Entitled to 500K coins of any Bitcoin fork, includes BCH and BSV.

Judge did not recommend, it is an ORDER
-> "WHEREFORE, it is ordered that:1.The Motion to Compel [DE 210] is GRANTED..."
-> "Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(A)(i), the Court deems the following facts to be established for purposes of this action:"
-> "DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers this 27thday of August, 2019, at West Palm Beach in the Southern District of Florida."

BSV shills can't read.

For the lazy ones