Quote from: Asa96942 on August 31, 2019, 08:05:01 AM

Quote from: metallicelmo on August 23, 2019, 01:42:04 PM

IFC is just like Doge, it may need some technical upgrades but other than that it works just fine. I have been holding some IFC since 2012 and will continue to do so.

One problem that I see is we need more miners. The more different miners, the smaller the chances of 51% attacks. But this goes for every crypto. This is not something that IFC suffers from alone. If support for BitcoinCash would drop severely then it would also be easy to attack that is someone wanted to do harm. In the end 51% attacks cost a lot of power (money) to do and the return isn't that great.

One more thing is that IFC doesn't have a real team so there are multiple wallets out there that people don't trust. I still use 1.8.8

To succeed more you need people actively talking about IFC on Twitter etc. That's where all the crypto people are today. I don't know anyone else (in person) that uses BitcoinTalk even though I still like it.

Returning ifc to the world is inevitably an not easy process, so I hope to get everyone's sincere efforts and regain everyone's consensus and recognition. I believe ifc is a good coin.

Ifc's network computing power has now reached 10G, and the computing power is distributed on more than 100 miners, so the computing power is scattered, which is not the same concept as the personal stacking power, now ifc miners have more than 100 people, And will be 200 people and 300 people in the future. Ifc's total network computing power will change from the current 10G to 20G， 30G.so as long as we have been developing the foundation, Ifc this coin will gain more and more people's consensus, and They will come from all countries and cities in the world, and I believe that day will come in the near future.