Quote from: Quickseller on September 05, 2019, 12:52:06 AM

You need to lean to follow the rules, especially in regards to making your posts relevant to the OP of the thread you are posting in, regardless if you are responding to a recent post in the thread.

What are you talking about. Present the specific rules broken and if they ARE broken in this specific case how are those posts I am responding to NOT breaking the rules. These are the exactly the same points being made. There is NO difference at all. Moronbozo is specifically addressing a single person being appropriate or not for DT (in his opinion) and so are we. Actually we are just clarifying his point. You can not ask for clarity and reasons behind a persons post if THEY are deemed on topic and relevant and make an identical point without being off topic and relevant. You can not make an addition (we observe MORE inappropriate DT members) or expansion to an on topic and relevant reply without being deleted?

This is VERY UNCLEAR because we were instructed recently by another DT member that we were derailing by discussing strictly the central point of the OP when the last few pages had wandered off onto other matters. LOL the rules are ever changing it would seem. You are derailing by sticking firmly and rigidly to the OP if they say so, or you are off topic and irrelevant for responding directly and making an identical point to a recent post that is on topic and relevant (according to DTs and mods) haha

Brilliant system.

They either ALL need to be deleted or NONE need to be deleted.

Therefore ANY posts in that thread that discuss specific members being on DT and their eligibility based on their prior histories or opinions of such SHOULD BE DELETED.

Else this is selective and corrupt moderation. There can be no question of this.

You say therefore the new underlying mechanisms of DT selection and NOT their implications and results are on topic ONLY? whats to discuss. The mechanisms are the mechanisms, the governing rules are the governing rules, if no implications and results are on topic then it is a going to be a very narrow discussion and all predictive and guesswork. You can speculate on the mechanisms implications and results but as it proceeds along (and fails) you can not present the actual outcome and result of the under lying design changes.

Brilliant set of rules that lead to the optimal solution and results. Also very adaptable it would seem to suit DT and merit sources and their mod pals.

Now let's hear your in depth and specific reply with examples so we can see what YOUR OPINION is of the rules regarding being on topic and relevant .... if you will a transparent step by step with examples of how and how not to reply on this specific thread and examples from that thread that fit in and do not fit in with your opinion of breaking or not breaking the "rules".

I believe we mentioned that IF this is outside of the scope of what is up for discussion here then we will accept a delete if these other posts making identical points are also deleted. Not thepharmacists slop since that is clearly off topic and invalid objectively (but not to corrupt mods)

It is said that someone once tried to start a thread that addressed PERMITTED FLOW and generate example scenarios as a definitive and reliable guide. Sadly nobody was able to contribute to such threads so they died off like all the most valuable threads here. Also greatly lacking in merit and appreciation.

Sad really since that would be KEY to creating a fair and optimal environment for this movement. Along with another great thread attempting to define a post of objective value in the context or arriving at the optimal solution or answer. Only posters of real value make threads such as those though, the status quo proponents don't want any of that transparent objective standards introduced.... fuck that how will they ensure their chipmixer slots then? well they would still have the trust abuse stick to brandish on any that were making too many posts that had REAL MERIT.

You seem to have some insight into the REAL rules on permitted flow when there seems NO definitive guide to permitted flow at all except the reply must be connected directly to the OP. Even that seems to require some drill down and clarity. We await your specific and detailed guide which demonstrates we are in some way clearly breaking these clear rules you have special insight into.

Looking at this entire thread in question there are a LOT of off topic replies like a huge proportion if ours are. Mostly from DT members though so those are probably not up for delete anytime soon.

This is a post about double standards as much as the REAL permitted flow.

Should not the readers optimal and wide understanding of the OP and all directly related matters be key?

WILL BE BUMPING THIS every 12 hours until the cowardly scum bag reporters and cowardly corrupt sig spamming shady moderator who deleted them answers and debates with me on their actions. Stop hiding away because it is not going to be swept under the carpet. We are feeling refreshed and energized after our vacation.