So you think Talkstar is open this thread with no real grounds, and that he is "unfairly targeting" BQT&IOU for not paying bounty participants x or xx months after the promised deadline? I think it's wrong to set things up in a way "They all do same things", so why BQT should be different.
I agree with Talkstar opening a thread. It brought it to their attention.
I disagree that it is a scam by BQT or IOU. There are other projects that were affected by the same bounty manager that are far longer overdue but nobody is accusing them of scamming.
Definition of a scam is a dishonest scheme or fraud. There is no proof that there was any intent of dishonesty or fraud by BQT.
If I accused all my customers that were late paying my invoices of being scammers it is likely that I wouldn't be in business for long.
While I believe it is up to BQT to sort out - which they are doing. I am sympathetic towards the reason for the delay - which I believe is not their fault.
Price of both token is go down, and BQT is from ATH $1.74 (May 20, 2019) now at only $0.08. So by "forgeting" to pay participants in time, they will maybe give them tokens that are much less valuable.
Not correct. Look closely at the graph. There was no trading volume prior to August 1 on that graph.
From $1.26 on 29th July to $0.09 (as of today).
If you look at the graph at the bottom it shows volume. There was no volume traded before August 1 so it is likely that the value was based on the issue price based on ETH from the ICO (and fluctuating based on ETH price) or on very low volume - not real trading price.