Quote from: jbreher on September 09, 2019, 04:05:42 PM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on September 08, 2019, 11:12:34 PM

Quote from: jbreher on September 08, 2019, 03:37:06 PM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on September 08, 2019, 04:31:14 AM

If jbreher uses his intelligence to deceive people

Not at all. At least never intentionally.

Quote

or to to get caught in stupid-ass technical arguments

I guess it takes a self-described technical ignoramus to openly refer to technical arguments as 'stupid-ass'.

you have a significantly large amount of misleading and misinformation in your posts

You are wrong. There is no such thing as factual information that is misleading or misinforming.

O.k. We don't agree. It seems that I already made my case on this point anyhow. No need to repeat myself.

Quote from: jbreher on September 09, 2019, 04:05:42 PM

I present facts, and leave the editorializing to a minimum.

O.k.

Quote from: jbreher on September 09, 2019, 04:05:42 PM

Any mis- is in your misattribution of ulterior motive to my actions, which causes you to invent things in my writings that are not there.

Huh? Funny I still see you making misinformations, and spinning matters. I did not realize that I was causing it.

Quote from: jbreher on September 09, 2019, 04:05:42 PM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on September 08, 2019, 11:12:34 PM

Regarding your stupid-ass technical arguments, they frequently are stupid-ass because they either are misleading or they are put too much weight on improbable events, which is another form of misleading.

Again, I present mostly scenarios within the range of possibility. I rarely assign probabilities to such events.

Good on you. Wink

Quote from: jbreher on September 09, 2019, 04:05:42 PM

OTOH, to outwardly shame the presenter of truthful possibilities is indeed in itself a misleading activity, largely the domain of those trying to prevent the truth from becoming widely known.

jbreher = purveyor of truth. Who would have thunk?

Quote from: jbreher on September 09, 2019, 04:05:42 PM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on September 08, 2019, 11:12:34 PM

Since it seems quite unlikely that you are going to get banned,

Dream on, compadre, dream on.

There's no dreaming about my statement. Some trolls or shills get banned.

Quote from: jbreher on September 09, 2019, 04:05:42 PM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on September 08, 2019, 11:12:34 PM

Remember Jstolfi?

What the hell does Stolfi have to do with this? Absolutely nothing.

I already said what Stolfi had to do with this. Some members have proclaimed that you are polite, and some members have proclaimed that Stolfi was polite.

Quote from: jbreher on September 09, 2019, 04:05:42 PM

Stolfi was rational, but he worked from flawed axioms - to wit:
- Bitcoin is merely a currency at best.
- Deflationary currencies can never work in any role in economic society.

So what? You believe different things and you troll about different things. You still might be seen to have similar styles in some regards.

Quote from: jbreher on September 09, 2019, 04:05:42 PM

Nay, the axiom that we seem to disagree upon would seem to be my belief that actual utility matters.

Times are different, and ways of attacking bitcoin are different. Stolfi has been shown to have been a clown, and perhaps you will be shown to be a clown, too. Surely, you are way more persistent that Stolfi, and he only lasted a couple of years in these parts, but you have been on and on and on with your various BIG blocker talking points for at least 4 years.

Quote from: jbreher on September 09, 2019, 04:07:57 PM

Quote from: somac. on September 08, 2019, 11:32:44 PM

JJG, you may be a bit too wordy, but I'm glad that you spare the time to call out the destructive bullshit that jbreher spews in order to manipulate others. I am also thankful for Hairy's contributions as well.

Yeah. Too bad for your camp of witch-burners that JJG never actually addresses any of the points made, and that when Hairy does, it backfires spectacularly due to his/her lack of grasp of the very topics s/he utters.

There are a sufficient number of members who call you out on your bullshit without really getting trapped into your distracting nonsense and arguing with you too much into the weeds of your bullshit, so I would not really categorize them as losing the arguments or not sufficiently understanding your dumbass points, merely because we sometimes choose NOT to go down your largely irrelevant and repeated path.