Quote from: owlcatz on September 09, 2019, 01:24:02 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 09, 2019, 01:02:19 AM

Also, on a side note, I don't add and remove people to my trust list based on their reciprocation or not. I do however exclude people such as most of the people here in this thread pointing fingers who exclude me because all their buddies said so, I once hurt their feelings, I once called out a wrong they did, or I argued against their ideology that time and they find this a good excuse to sooth that cognitive dissonance with some good old fashion petty retribution.

Me either. Personally, I just don't like you, as you are a dickhead. Cheers. Tongue

Thanks for the public admission you value your whims more than the constitution of the trust system and overall well being of the community. What you are describing is called a popularity contest, not a trust system.

Quote from: suchmoon on September 09, 2019, 01:36:26 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 09, 2019, 01:02:19 AM

This user was excluded not for making a threat, not for even advocating violence, but for having an objectionable opinion in public.

You do realize that anyone can look at BitcoinSupremo's rap sheet and see that you're lying?

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 09, 2019, 01:02:19 AM

Also, on a side note, I don't add and remove people to my trust list based on their reciprocation or not.

Also contradicted by publicly available information.

This whole thread is focused around his words and claims it is a call to violence, homophobia, etc, but you are really claiming he was excluded because he is a legitimate threat of fraud? Funny how everyone is talking 100% about his words and not one bit about the supposed fraud he is responsible for, and which I don't see in any of those ratings.

That is just a log of DT changes. All that that is, is a log of when it happened, not why it happened. You are free to make baseless insinuations, but that doesn't make it factual or even meaningful. I included and excluded people as new information became available, not based on if they included me or not. I also have proof of the contrary, and it is far more convincing than your insinuation.