If jbreher uses his intelligence to deceive people
Not at all. At least never intentionally.
or to to get caught in stupid-ass technical arguments
I guess it takes a self-described technical ignoramus to openly refer to technical arguments as 'stupid-ass'.
you have a significantly large amount of misleading and misinformation in your posts
You are wrong. There is no such thing as factual information that is misleading or misinforming. I present facts, and leave the editorializing to a minimum. Any mis- is in your misattribution of ulterior motive to my actions, which causes you to invent things in my writings that are not there.
Regarding your stupid-ass technical arguments, they frequently are stupid-ass because they either are misleading or they are put too much weight on improbable events, which is another form of misleading.
Again, I present mostly scenarios within the range of possibility. I rarely assign probabilities to such events.
OTOH, to outwardly shame the presenter of truthful possibilities is indeed
in itself a misleading activity, largely the domain of those trying to prevent the truth from becoming widely known.
Since it seems quite unlikely that you are going to get banned,
Dream on, compadre, dream on.
Remember Jstolfi?
What the hell does Stolfi have to do with this?
Absolutely nothing. Stolfi was rational, but he worked from flawed axioms - to wit:
- Bitcoin is merely a currency at best.
- Deflationary currencies can never work in any role in economic society.
Nay, the axiom that
we seem to disagree upon would seem to be my belief that actual utility matters.