Quote from: HairyMaclairy on September 09, 2019, 07:54:27 PM

Quote from: jbreher on September 09, 2019, 04:05:42 PM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on September 08, 2019, 11:12:34 PM

Quote from: jbreher on September 08, 2019, 03:37:06 PM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on September 08, 2019, 04:31:14 AM

If jbreher uses his intelligence to deceive people

Not at all. At least never intentionally.

Quote

or to to get caught in stupid-ass technical arguments

I guess it takes a self-described technical ignoramus to openly refer to technical arguments as 'stupid-ass'.

you have a significantly large amount of misleading and misinformation in your posts

You are wrong. There is no such thing as factual information that is misleading or misinforming. I present facts, and leave the editorializing to a minimum. Any mis- is in your misattribution of ulterior motive to my actions, which causes you to invent things in my writings that are not there.

I guess the courts must have it wrong when they ask witnesses to tell the whole truth.

Quote

Do you solemnly (swear/affirm) that you will tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, (so help you God/under pains and penalties of perjury)?

No. You misunderstand the term 'the whole truth' as used by the courts. If 'the whole truth' were synonymous with 'all the truth of which you are aware', then any court would bog down at the first question posed to the first witness in the first case they try, never ever never to get to the next case.

Quote

Thats your problem. You tell the selective, partial truth all the time,

You know what? Everyone tells selected partial truth every time they make any claim of factuality. And that's not my problem, that's your problem.

Quote

mixed with your opinion and supposition.

I do occasionally editorialize. At which point, I insert the appropriate verbiage to indicate that I have transitioned from fact to opinion. Unless it is so bleedingly obvious that it is clearly superfluous.

Quote

It is deliberately misleading.

Bullshit.

Quote

You hide behind technical arguments

Says the whiner who was obliterated in our last technical exchange because you introduced supporting evidence that was completely counter to your position, blissfully ignorant that it actually buttressed mine.

Just so I understand your position - how exactly does one hide behind a technical argument?

Quote

which rely on narrow, outdated definitions.

Technical discussions invariably rely on narrow definitions. As for "outdated", you'd need to give me examples to know of what it is that you are speaking.

Quote

And then you get angry when you are called out.

I don't get angry, I reply.