Quote from: Asa96942 on September 10, 2019, 03:45:04 AM

Quote from: metallicelmo on August 23, 2019, 01:42:04 PM

IFC is just like Doge, it may need some technical upgrades but other than that it works just fine. I have been holding some IFC since 2012 and will continue to do so.

One problem that I see is we need more miners. The more different miners, the smaller the chances of 51% attacks. But this goes for every crypto. This is not something that IFC suffers from alone. If support for BitcoinCash would drop severely then it would also be easy to attack that is someone wanted to do harm. In the end 51% attacks cost a lot of power (money) to do and the return isn't that great.

One more thing is that IFC doesn't have a real team so there are multiple wallets out there that people don't trust. I still use 1.8.8

To succeed more you need people actively talking about IFC on Twitter etc. That's where all the crypto people are today. I don't know anyone else (in person) that uses BitcoinTalk even though I still like it.

Statistics on the collection of unlimited coins overseas nodes September 10, 2019 (non-continental areas)

86.175.13.248 United Kingdom
80.10.13.44 France
78.133.30.90 Malta
73.85.164.145 United States
70.187.13.208 United States
47.75.34.41 Hong Kong
47.52.64.168 Hong Kong
46.146.235.24 Russia
24.207.220.202 United States
185.222.211.18 United Kingdom
172.87.223.66 United States
109.105.40.15 Czech Republic
103.72.165.221 Hong Kong
216.154.55.132 Canada
64.229.85.251 Canada
47.252.81.22 United States
78.148.230.34 United Kingdom
68.13.33.9 United States
188.22.141.220 Austria
128.71.125.36 Russia
95.217.78.80 Ukraine
84.109.194.15 Israel

Nodes that have been discovered and undiscovered statistics are not 100% accurate.

Excuse me, are these nodes ordinary nodes or full nodes? What is the difference between a normal node and a full node