Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
wtf these new planes have jet engines, and cars have airbags?!?! But but none of this was in the original design!!!
OMG - but still TCP/IP , smtp, SWIFT, FIX have not built in smart contracts - or did I miss u mix apples and crap?
Congrats you managed to fail on all levels, this is truly an accomplishment you should be proud of yourself
TCP/IP - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6
smtp - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_SMTP
SWIFT - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_for_Worldwide_Interbank_Financial_Telecommunication#SWIFTNet_Phase_2
FIX - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FAST_protocol
Ha. Haha. Hahahahahhaaa. I should let this one go, but this is just too funny. Call me weak, I don't care.
I am intimately familiar with the contents of the underlying documents which officially define half of those protocols. I'm quite sure that neither rfc791, nor rfc793 nor rfc2460 nor rfc5321 nor any of their subsequent amplifications or revisions say doodly-squat about smart contracts.
But then again, I'm always up for learning something new. Where in each of those standards is the smart contract funcitonality hidden? Hmmmm?
You should be proud of yourself indeed. IOW, You managed to fail on all levels.
Ok let me spell it out. My simple argument was that no one cares about the original design, all things change and improve all the time, and even hv_ link proposed long standing standards have indeed went through few revisions as well. Apologies if it went over your had, didn't mean to make you look for smart contracts in IPv6 specs
