Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: [NSFW] - phisical violence in DT - "not safe for work" content
by
marlboroza
on 11/09/2019, 17:25:14 UTC
He was being targeted for speaking out.
This is not true. He was tagged because his account has bitcoin connection with scammer egg.chuck, he was tagged because he used alt accounts to self vouch for payed gambling tips ("I bought tip, would recommend") and he was tagged for making blatant lies. As I said few times, everything is publicly available information, together with his other retaliatory nonsensical feedback you ARE ignoring right now.

No one buys your feigned ignorance, especially with you personally pushing 2 or 3 threads
I am sorry, I don't understand what you are trying to say. I am pointing that next users become default trust members/will maybe become DT members:

1)scammers
2)banned accounts
3)hacked accounts
4)inactive accounts

Seems you can't understand this and you see this as personal attack.
To be perfectly frank, if some one had simply politely notified me of this issues, I probably would have just removed him.
FTFY. How many times will you ignore my post?


Vod starting one with a retaliatory negative rating and the rest of the clowns all chiming in at once. This was clearly coordinated.
Of course, my counter to Vod's -ve feedback was also coordinated by clowns.

and the rest of the clowns all chiming in at once. This was clearly coordinated.
negative is not appropriate.
This was also coordinated by clowns.