Quote from: marlboroza on September 18, 2019, 10:18:55 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 18, 2019, 09:20:50 PM

I don't want people to fall victims to scams either

It doesn't look so, just recently you said something like "scammer is overall good member" and they "should be unbanned".

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 18, 2019, 09:20:50 PM

It is impossible to protect everyone from themselves and their own lack of due diligence.

If we "protect" at least 1 member I would say that is a good progress. Make small steps. Or, do you think, "if you can't make big steps don't do anything at all"? That would be wrong.

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 18, 2019, 09:20:50 PM

Even if innocent this whole mob justice OCD process you have all set the precedent as being the norm is an equal if not greater threat to innocent users because it is unending and there are zero repercussions if you are wrong.

I think you are very hypocritical here.

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 18, 2019, 09:20:50 PM

I am sure you believe you are doing what is right

Exposing scammers and making newcomers and people who fail to do due diligence is not right thing to do? That is another side of trust system. Do you think trust system should have only one side?

So what is wrong with exposing potentially hacked account? Undecided

I said no such thing. I don't need to defend myself from your interpretations, only what I actually said. Protect one member at what cost exactly? I never said do nothing, this is what is called a "false choice" logical fallacy. I do not participate in mobs, so no, it is not hypocritical. Again, the question is what is the cost of this pattern of behavior. If it drives away 10 contributing members forever to out one scammer who will just be back in seconds on a new account is it worth it?