Quote from: Periodik on September 19, 2019, 02:05:55 AM

Quote from: passwordnow on September 18, 2019, 02:51:20 AM

Quote from: Periodik on September 18, 2019, 02:43:28 AM

Quote

...but the quality of projects has rounded at 4.0.

What does this mean? That the quality of projects have decreased? And whose standard is it based? Is it coming from your platform alone?

I have also the same question but their metrics and statistics must be from 0-10. So overall the rating didn't even reached the half of it which is 10 in ratings.
It's obvious that many ICO doesn't have anything to show anymore and as for the IEO, there's plenty of them that are conducting it right now but same as ICO, only few of them will emerge.

That has always been the pattern ever since the ICO market became so crowded and full of scams and mediocre projects. And although IEO has made the market a little bit better, it still carried with it the dirt from the polluted ICO market. As expected, many are going to fail.

If their rating is 0-10 and the average is 4, that could mean that the quality of projects has decreased significantly or the projects under review of their site have stopped paying or buying higher ratings. At the end of the day, ratings do not necessarily reflect the quality of the projects. There have been highly rated projects that did not even hit their soft caps.

Right!
They have similarities with ICO and the abusers and scammers who create useless projects can still use the IEO to scam people. Making their project look like the best but it's more of a crap project.
Yes, the quality of projects has decreased. We will see by the end of the year on how many projects through IEO became successful unlike few years ago with ICO, many succeed.