Quote from: ampbuster on February 20, 2014, 02:57:02 AM

Quote from: Terk on February 20, 2014, 02:22:47 AM

Quote from: phzi on February 20, 2014, 01:51:41 AM

Tested some of my hashing power here for a while since Terk said the reject rates had improved... at max, CleverMining reported slightly under my actual hashrate, and rejects averaged over 20% still (and I am very close to the server...)!

Looking less profitable then wafflepool, and the BTC/day/MH rate published appears to be an utter joke since the site is definitely under reporting my hashrate (tested continuously for about half a day), and then I am losing an extra 20% to rejects. Looks like nearly a 35% inflation of BTC/day/MH compared to wafflepool which has been a consistent a slight under estimate.

All my hashing power is back on wafflepool for now. Will try again if reject rates actually improve.

You are counting the same thing twice.

Your reported hashrate is lower than your actual because of these 20% rejected. They're already calculated. Reporeted hashrate = accepted hashrate (after substracting rejected).

I would appreciate it if the pool shows the BTC/MH that includes the rejected shares. This would be more accurate.

Feel free to create your own pool where you can show your data the way you want.