Quote from: figmentofmyass on September 19, 2019, 06:14:20 PM

@gentlemand thanks for finding that. i never read the reputation board.

tbh i thought jack dorsey had something to do with it. i'm glad to see he didn't. a lot of early adopters probably got together and backed the sale. i assume instagibbs isn't really loaded enough to outbid roger ver.

It's a weird board that's best avoided overall. It's 96.8% pointless and incomprehensible shrieking about stuff that I genuinely cannot figure out what they're on about. Do these people have actual business dealings with each other? It rarely looks like it.

The odd gem pops up though like that.

I'd be curious to know what other posters here would do if they owned such valuable properties like that handle and bitcoin.com. Would you whore it out or safeguard its exploitation? No amount of money would make up for the disgust I'd feel at the misleading going on. It would be very, very hard to resist whoring but there's no way I could allow it without a giant veto button.

Quote from: Kyraishi on September 19, 2019, 12:44:35 AM

I'm going off this figure from recent sales from other popular crypto based domain, like the ones below.

Crypto.com was sold for 12 million to a finance project. (biggest domain sale ever)
Tokens.com was sold for 500,000.
Tokens.com was also sold for an undisclosed price, I'd assume around the 2 million mark.
ETH.com was sold for 2 million.

There's an interesting wee parallel with alts there. For whatever reason after all this time .com is still the gold standard despite it being three largely meaningless letters. The only reason why is because the collective has decided that's how it's going to be. Tokens.co is available for $999 right now. Is one solitary M worth another $499,001 to you?