Quote from: nutildah on September 23, 2019, 08:48:23 AM

Quote from: CryptoSparks on September 23, 2019, 08:31:25 AM

I already explained what those negative PNL of 0.0001 mBTC ( 0.001$ loss) several times in the other Threads.

There's a bug in the bitmex websocket's position endpoint. After several days without trades, the position value restores and the endpoint returns error when trying to access it. This causes the bots to crash. What's the solution until bitmex fixes the problem? Make instant 1 contract trades to unlock the endpoint. That 0.001$ loss is the fee paid as taker(necessary to close the "unlock trade" in less than 1 second) and the mathematical loss that come from the 0.5$ of spread between the ask and the bid.

Nevertheless, its still a loss.

Quote from: CryptoSparks on September 23, 2019, 08:31:25 AM

I have all kind of verifiable data, if you are unable to access a bitmex account via terminal is
not my problem, but i will make an easy step by step guide when i will have some free time.

No, you don't. You have 1 data set of a handful of trades made this month. Anything else you are referring to is non-applicable to the service you are offering in this thread.

Quote from: CryptoSparks on September 23, 2019, 08:31:25 AM

You still don't understand what a Market Maker is , and why they REQUIRE HUGE AMOUNT OF CAPITALS. Please DYOR before making a fool of yourself over and over again.

As defined by BitMEX a "market maker" is ANYBODY who places a limit order. You could place a limit order of 0.001 BTC and boom, voila, you are now a market maker. So the "requiring huge amount of capitals" idea is completely bogus. Perhaps don't be such an over-assuming ass if you don't want to make an ass of yourself over and over again.

Quote from: CryptoSparks on September 23, 2019, 08:31:25 AM

The 495% roi in 20 months is backtest, the exact same code that is running right now with 100% win rate. Before attacking the validity of backtest, please learn what they are and why they are mandatory for every legit bot.

You are just expecting people to take your word that you have not altered either the bot or the data set. Why can't you see the problem here?

Again, all you actually have data on is your 7.615 mBTC deposit, which is less money than the minimum you are asking to participate.

I see this as incredibly risky and would never touch what you are offering. Some people are lazy at heart and too enamored by the idea of "passive income" to dig deeper into what they are getting themselves involved in, so you will inevitably find new suckers to draw into your scheme. If you make them all broke, I can't help but think they deserved it.

Quote

Nevertheless, its still a loss.

Is not a loss caused by the algo and is so small that has absolutely no value or impact on the overall ROI. Nice try

Quote

Anything else you are referring to is non-applicable to the service you are offering in this thread.

Learn what backtests are an why 600 trades over 20 months are valuable evidence. Furthermore the real 33 wins in a row in 3 weeks since launch is no handfull and is not luck. Is backtest accuracy. There's no way to prove the backtest accuracy without giving access to the source code to competent people. This will never happen because:
a. source code will never ever ever be shared
b. most of users in here, including yourself, are just... users. you know how to use SOME things, you have no idea how and why they work that way. But is ok. Is not your job. But at least avoid starting a witch hunt while you have very little knowledge in the sphere of interest. Accept to be wrong sometimes.

Quote

I see this as incredibly risky and would never touch what you are offering. Some people are lazy at heart and too enamored by the idea of "passive income" to dig deeper into what they are getting themselves involved in, so you will inevitably find new suckers to draw into your scheme. If you make them all broke, I can't help but think they deserved it.

Everything market related, has risks. You might find that risking on average 5% of all bankroll per position is too risky, but that's just your opinion. I have no other interest than bringing profits to my clients, simply because i earn only from their profits. I wonder why you never attack casinos and betting games that earn on users' loss and are CODED to make the player lose on long term. I wonder why you can't accept that there are systems and people able to make money from trading. 2 BLN daily volume on bitmex, and everybody is loosing money? You know right that those 2bln are the amount of money that winners take to losers?

Also, do you think i would put my real funds on a public access account? That deposit is coming straight from a commission from another bot. Furthermore backtest shows that going bellow 7 mbtc as bankroll, would cause arakne to try marketmaking with less than 1 contract(which of course is impossible). this because the bot is so safe that the first entry put you at only 1% risk. Market Makers BOT are designed to provide liquidity and collecting the rebates. What kind of liquidity do you think you can provide with 100$ ? Grin

I like how the others are stupid and lazy, while you prove yourself to know absolutely nothing about market behaviors or our business model.
Other users know you very well, you think you can damage my business with your flags and red trust? Your pathetic attempts only brought attention on Arakne, and all the points i debunked with knowledge,data and reputable sources only cleared more doubts that people could have had.

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 21, 2019, 03:01:11 PM

Quote from: nutildah on September 21, 2019, 02:57:55 PM

Congratulations, you managed to type 4 paragraphs while saying nothing.

Just oppose the flag and be on with your day.

I don't have time to deal with another cryptohunter.

I see. So it is ok for you to run around making unsupported allegations, but supported allegations against your own behaviors are not acceptable. I think you need to prove to me you aren't involved in a protection racket because you seem to have a large ego and air of superiority.

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 21, 2019, 08:03:44 AM

Quote from: nutildah on September 20, 2019, 06:34:16 PM

Perhaps I'd consider withdrawing my support after more evidence of his legitimacy has come to light.

Isn't this the exact opposite of the intended purpose of flags? I thought the evidence was supposed to be presented before supporting it, not create a conclusion and then build a narrative around it. You know, innocent until proven guilty, not your rep is toast until you can prove yourself/appease the mob.

Guys, I know its way satisfying to hunt down dirt bags, but in the process you are degrading this community to a standard of mob justice and might makes right. This atmosphere not only drives out honest users, it creates constant chaos and conflict which is a great way for scam artists to hide in by not only easily diverting attention, but making it a simple task to target honest users who are resisting corruption.

I know casting suspicion and hoping to be right is way easier than doing the research to prove it first, but this precedent of guilty until proven innocent needs to stop. This community highly values privacy, anonymity, autonomy, and decentralization, all things that are regularly stripped from users under this precedent. There are so few platforms left where there is even a chance of preserving these things. Don't let this forum be consumed by this malignant obsession with finding and punishing scammers at all costs, because they will ALWAYS be there, no matter how many you stop.

Can you go hide under a rock now? Thanks Kiss

PEOPLE, LISTEN TO THIS USER THAT IS VERY WORRIED ABOUT YOUR MONEY
Why should you enter the markets with a proved system, better go BETTING on the service he spams everywhere. We all know how safe and profitable is betting

If you are bettor, learn also how you can make money with that... but is WAY HARDER and WAY riskier than trading.