Quote from: mu_enrico on September 25, 2019, 12:35:23 PM

Quote from: Pmalek on September 25, 2019, 09:53:42 AM

50 members per campaign posting 25 posts each (minimum) equals 1250 posts per week. Not to mention that sometimes only parts of the post are plagiarized so during the initial checking he could think everything is ok when in fact 2 out of the total 20 sentences are copy/pasted.

My question to campaign managers, would you really go through all this hassle?

Maybe managers should hire one or two qualified post reviewer (similar to peer review) as a quality controller. Hence, even with the 20-25 post per week, no one will complain about the quality.

Stop. We don't need 'post reviewers'. People report posts, yes? I've actually smashed through hundreds of posts in the 777Coin and Bitvest campaigns.

And regarding the plagiarism issue: it's simple enough to automate the process. We already have some people who have checked entire post histories for plagiarism, so I don't see why the same cannot be done for a campaign cycle across a few dozen users.

I see a lot of people here taking the piss. We already know, "signatures are a privilege, not a right," yet I see absurd suggestions... under the expectation that signatures will be around for a long time. Roll Eyes