...
In fact socrates is very black and white regarding the reversal system there can be no ambiguity. so basically it comes down to emotional IQ that is the key when using this system.
In fact socrates is very black and white regarding the reversal system there can be no ambiguity. so basically it comes down to emotional IQ that is the key when using this system.
The Socrates system is full of ambiguities. Socrates provides no conclusion from the multitude of conflicting trading signals it provides:
See Socrates Technical Analysis Prediction Magic
Talking about ambiguity, you can read there about a case where this moron Gumbi who is paid by Armstrong or is Armstrong himself advises to ignore the election of a reversal, elected within 1% rule, and then trade another reversal that was NOT elected. This is sheer madness.
Calling this an computer system is already a joke, because a computer system would know the rules and calculate the result from the multitude of conflicting signals.
This contraption looks more like a bunch of pocket calculators.
Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud
See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog
why so antagonistic, are you always this emotional?
This system is very simple but you have no idea how it works, regarding trading a reversal that was not elected, all four reversals need to be elected to change the trend, this is where we elected the 3rd bearish reversal but held the fourth.
Ha ha. Gumbi who promised to post real-time trade is back, but NEVER did. I wonder why?
Yeah, and he claimed that he NEVER lost any money on every trade using Socrates. He is a trading god (by HINDSIGHT).
That's right. More advertising for Armstrong. The system is "very simple" that it took years and 320 pages on this forum, and NOBODY has demonstrated even one viable repeatable strategy using any of Armstrong's stuffs. I wonder how?