Quote from: OgNasty on September 27, 2019, 06:12:09 PM

I guess nobody sees a problem with someone making up a tax evasion story about someone in order to attempt to extort a settlement on behalf of a government revenue collection agency in another country?

Who wouldn't have a problem with that? lol At this point, you get ignored on statements like this as well as a lot of Vod's because both have resorted to just hoping the person reading believes them, instead of them being able to make an informed decision on anything new being brought up. Informed decisions require good facts which are backed with evidence or proof. If you're not doing this, you're adding to the shit show.

Quote from: OgNasty on September 26, 2019, 06:08:33 PM

Quote from: Vod on September 25, 2019, 11:53:35 PM

Maybe one day OG will come clean to everyone.

That's why I'm trusted by the people who have access to the truth, and you aren't.

And how exactly does one get access to the truth?

theymos, I want access!!.. I can handle it! Cool

Quote

The point is that the quality of an argument often depends upon the quality of the evidence or facts that support it.

Quote

a social psychologist and the Thomas Cooley Professor of Ethical Leadership at New York University, often points out that, for most of us, belief comes first, logical reasoning comes second. In other words, we determine what we want to prove first and then work out the logical arguments to justify that belief.

Quote

Perhaps our ethical responsibility is to be aware of these error-inducing tendencies.

https://blogs.butler.edu/cepa/2013/12/14/is-being-logical-the-same-as-being-ethical/