Quote from: nutildah on September 28, 2019, 05:27:52 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 28, 2019, 05:04:00 AM

Of course it is observable. Objective proof of fraud it is not, just an assumption.

Objective proof of fraud isn't needed for a type 1 flag.

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 28, 2019, 05:04:00 AM

I know for a fact others agree with me. Most won't speak up for fear of being the next one targeted arbitrarily in retribution for challenging the hive mind.

I'm open to dissenting opinion, and you're not the only one dissenting. You've just overlooked the others because their existence doesn't fit in with your narrative. And your dissenting isn't even based on an actual analysis of the situation at hand but rather your desire to troll the regular targets. You should probably add CryptoSparks to your trust list as your next move, if you haven't already.

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 28, 2019, 05:04:00 AM

After all burning witches at the stake makes you look good and raises your profile. Defending people from the witch hunters is just work that will result in retribution, why would they speak up?

Suchmoon doesn't need to "raise their profile" (whatever that even means) as they - unlike you - have long been considered a voice of reason around here.

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 28, 2019, 05:04:00 AM

Unlike you I don't measure my self worth based on the judgements of others

And that's the problem. You measure your self worth based on your own judgments of yourself, which is why you are so out of touch with reality and nobody takes you seriously.

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 28, 2019, 05:04:00 AM

but hey maybe if you keep trying to marginalize me suddenly it will work.

You marginalize yourself every time you enter the fray with a bullheaded attitude that is based on little other than the desire to attack your "opponents."

"concrete red flags" = objective evidence

It does not mean guesses, suspicions, or assumptions, all of which are not concrete but arbitrary and completely subjective. I am not overlooking anything, I am refuting their arguments and bringing attention to the fact that this kind of arbitrary enforcement will not only not prevent scams, but will result in people disregarding the rules even more because of their arbitrary and selective enforcement breed disrespect for the rule of law. No one respects a system of rules for thee and not for me.

Many people argue trying to sell your account is grounds for accusations of fraud, yet some how you remain trusted, funny how that works. Could it be because these inquisitions are more of a popularity contest than an examination of facts? Either the standards apply to everyone or they apply to no one, and for them to apply to everyone they need to be well defined and objective.

Most of the people running around accusing people built their reputations on doing so, regularly at the expense of innocent users with no repercussions to themselves. Furthermore they prevent dissent to their opinions by creating an atmosphere where anyone can be made subject to these arbitrary accusations and scrutinizing every action they have ever taken. Tell me some more about attacking my opponents while your entire statement consists of personal attacks and almost nothing on topic.