Quote from: bitmover on September 30, 2019, 09:57:23 AM

I just told him my strategy to make good posts. There are other good strategies as well.

This is a good strategy for a guru who often answers questions from beginners. Not all of the forum participants can boast of your breadth of views and depth of knowledge to use it. You yourself do not always use it, and is ok.

Quote from: bitmover on September 30, 2019, 09:57:23 AM

There are other good strategies as well.

That's it. The forum is not wiki, here people express their opinion on a particular topic, it happens that they are having discussions. It happens that some projects develop over the years, and their topics on the forum become big, and it's ok too.

Quote from: LoyceV on September 30, 2019, 07:24:19 AM

I'll answer anyway: the main difference is that users can start getting paid before having their post history checked.

Sir, the manager is very productive, and the list of banned people is growing. I think if every identified violator receives a negative review of trust, this will be his last signature campaign on the forum. A small fee for the ability to identify a list of bounty cheaters (especially since it is not you who will pay it).