Quote from: bluehillfoundation.sup on October 04, 2019, 07:51:50 PM

Dear community:

As we have been falsely accused in this thread with misintended and misinterpreted data in favor of the perpetrator, below is the answer that we give regarding the ROI and the government link for the Blue Hill Mine license confirming that the license is paid and active, as well as other topics.

We will answer everything that you may doubt about, as this information can be found in several places around our communication assets. Its up to you and your common sense to give credit or not to the accusations, as we understand there can be doubts but not accusations. Simply because we haven't gotten any question to our support or communication team, even doe you can accesso to their mails by yourselfs. So, with respect and clear messages, we will inform your doubts in this thread thill they are all answered.

Explanation of the potential of increase in value of the BHM-Token.
The 8 year geological works performed on Blue Hill Mine, show an estimated resources of Copper: 1,400,000 tons - 5,900,000 tons; Nickel 2,005,560 tons 4,550,000 tons: Cobalt 165,888 tons - 638,280 tons; Gold 391 tons 1,651 tons) in less than 10% of the surface area. The remaining 90% of the surface area still remaining to be discovered, which covers a vast area of almost 70 times the size of the principality of Monaco. According to an acceptable valuation formula in the mining industry, Blue Hill Mine should be worth 20% to 30% of the total resources at current market value, whereas the final stock market value has historically proven to further enhance this ratio. Taking this formula into account the estimated resources of Blue Hill Mine is estimated at $23 per token. Blue Hill Foundation strategy is to sell a small percentage of the mine via a security token offering (more than 300 times undervalued). This in order to prove up the estimated resources of Blue Hill Mine to the Canadian National Instrument 43-101 standards (The Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects within Canada), so that the majority ownership of Blue Hill Mine will increase in value on the Canadian Stock Exchange. This is made possible due to the blockchain technology as for the very first time retail investors can have access to the previously highly restricted mining industry via a security token giving you a co-ownership into Blue Hill Mine. It is know that the mining industry carries a high risk and on the upside it is common that one can multiply its investment in this sector.

Many other mines and hence mine owners have similar ROI and much higher ROI then proposed by Blue Hill Mining
For example, Rob McEwen that turned US$1 million into US$3 billion and the larger players in the mining industry most of which make their billions from the mining industries including Vladimir Sergeyevich Lisin US$21 billion, Alisher Usmanov 18 billion, Lakshmi Mittal 16 billion, German Larrea Mota Velasco 16 billion, Viktor Vekselberg 16 billion, Vladimir Potanin 14 billion, Iris Fontbona 14 billion, Alberto Bailleres Gonzalez 12 billion, Rinat Akhmetov 12 billion as well as the neighboring mine called Turquoise Hill (now one of the largest copper mines in Asia), within the same metallic belt as Blue Hill Mine, making Robert Martin Friedland a billionaire (upon the discovery of the minerals to international standards).

For the Blue Hill Mine licenses
See government link that these license are paid and with status active License 14307 & License 14308.

Regarding Whitepaper
As expected in certain markets and especially in certain legal and bureaucratic areas, there are generic data and writing models already accepted and approved for use. It is no plagiarism to place these blocks of general information in our documents, since they correspond to correct and fundamental data of general themes of free use.
Being the accusation of plagiarism a bad intention based on falsehood and misrepresentation of the facts, we again give rise to the common sense that everything related to the Blue Hill Foundation project is of authorship and self-explanation as it is obvious to do; and we have taken certain meanings of concepts difficult to explain from other sources validated and active in communication.

It could be considered plagiarism if the majority of the document were an exact copy of a source, where the information dumped directly affected the proposed business model, economic data, expectation of return, roadmap, financial strategy, sponsors and partners , the advisors and / or the team. Since this is not the case, we regret having to explain something so logical and fundamental..

Regarding graphic footage from stock
Our Blue Hill Mine is an exploration mining project, in which 8 years of geological research have been invested. There has been no exploitation work in the field. As well as a thousand other industries and diverse markets in countless brands, it is logical that in a multimedia presentation legal footage is used to connotation and conceptualize the texts. At no time have we lacked the honesty and / or legality of our activity since the importance of the message lies in the text and the data described, not in the images.

Blue Hill Foundation
Communication & Marketing Department

Quote: "As we have been falsely accused in this thread with misintended and misinterpreted data..."

Actually you LIED/misintended from your 1st post claiming:

Quote from: bluehillfoundation.sup on May 20, 2019, 03:34:42 PM

B.H.Mining-STO

The B.H.Mining-STO is a fully Swiss regulated Security
Token Offering that owns 30% of the Blue Hill Mine as
well as 30% of the Blue Hill Platform.

This is wrong as the FINMA have a WARNING out against Blue Hill Mining, as they are NOT REGULATED in the Swiss jurisdiction. OH, and it is the Q4 2019 when this token is suppose to be regulate according to the Blue Hill Mining Timeline.

Regarding the Whitepaper and to put a hole in your definition of what plagiarism is....When you don't reference ANY material that you used, it is PLAGIARISM. Simple. You didn't reference the white paper you stole information from...simple...plagiarism...if only you referenced this, instead you tried to hide this information as your own work LOL

With respect to the people who invested with minerals and made money... LOL That isn't proof of anything...wow. I can't believe you think people will invest in this SCAM because you posted UNREALISTIC profits, and because other people made money that is NOW PROOF LOL...You really run a shit show of a SCAM.

Let's not forget how long it took to make their money and the fact that they are business men, who wouldn't invest in this SCAM to begin with.

Both of the white papers contradict each other in places, and you contradict yourself and the white papers.

SCAM