Quote from: Aismen on October 05, 2019, 01:59:55 PM

Quote from: Alfonn on October 04, 2019, 11:55:35 PM

Quote from: Aismen on October 04, 2019, 03:41:39 PM

Lol... difficulty is not the same, 100k vs 300 k. Hashrate is about 8-9 TH vs 24. FPGAs were not the target, more the asics were and you can clearly see the difference.

Difference in payout from mining is huge for a gpu rig now vs before.

Only issue i see is that people went with their hash on f2pool for the most of it 30-40% almost and that could raise some risks if it goes over 50.

COMPARING EARNINGS IN JUNE ITS ABOUT 60% NOW. WAS EXPECTING MUCH BETTER RESULT AS DIFFICULTY IS LESS.. HOW DO YOU SEE IT NOW MR. AISMEN?

Don't understand the shouting (CAPS) but ok.

If you could look at the hashrate spread in June vs now, you would see that no pool had 30-40% of hashrate. Probably payout will be better on f2pool but i do not want to move to that pool since it has most of the hasrate. Yes payout is now lower for me since i'm still on suprnova and i guess alot of the people are going to f2pool, creating a centralized situation with high risk of attack.

Try to understand mining a bit better and how it works and you will see why you are not getting a low payout if you're not on f2pool (and i'd suggest not to move there).

not only risk of attack, it's a risk of chain split too. Would be horrible if it happens at night while you can control it. I think f2pool should put a message to make some miners go out, or increase fee. If something bad happens it can have bad impact on the coin