Quote from: rwessels on February 20, 2014, 10:22:06 PM

If you have 10 MH/s and are getting 30% rejects, the system shows you are 7 MH/s. When these rates of BTC per MH/s are being quoted, are they on accepted MH/s or the total MH/s? If it does not include reject %, and say waffle is only 10% rejects, then waffle is the better pool.

Quote from: UdjinM6 on February 20, 2014, 10:09:42 PM

Quote from: igroock on February 20, 2014, 09:44:44 PM

Can someone explain to me how CleverMining is getting so many rejects considering its hash power has gone up significantly? Its a problem with Terks code it seems. Considering Waffle had 1GH last week and there was amost less than 1% of rejects. I am tired of seeing the phrase its normal, its not.

there is no need to worry about rejects as far as you get high profit:
waffel 0.0093
clever 0.011
I'm running 5mh/s on clever and I have this - "Last 24h Profits 0.05380326 BTC"
so it's really close to 0.011 per mh/s per day and I'm pretty happy with that

Well, I checked again. I have 5.2 mh/s reported by cgminer to be precise. The "system" shows me 5.2 and "Rejected: 0.3 MH/s (5.6%)" for the last hour. Also I get "4.8 MH/s 24-hour Average". As far as I can see on hashrate graph it became a lot more stable now and I expect 24-hour Average to grow a little. But even if it stays as it is I'm fine. Cool