Quote from: DaftAjax on October 11, 2019, 05:05:31 PM

And now, you're also leaning on not having, as much as possible, any contact with everything the government needs you to do

I actually like how well you put that, in a true Orwellian way

I refer to that last piece about "everything the government needs you to do". Needs you to do, huh. In real life, it is more like "do it or otherwise". I leave it to you what kind of punishment you can bring on yourself if you don't

Quote from: DaftAjax on October 11, 2019, 05:05:31 PM

Well, I can sympathize with that one (it's a pain in the ass). So, you really value anonymity that much? I was leaning on "transparency" by the government, so that fairness on both parties could be realized (more work for them)

That's another interesting example

Well, if you ask me (since you ask me anyway), I wouldn't call that "fairness" as it is actually a complete reinvention of the term ("we are 35 years late, but we are well on our way"). Fairness assumes somewhat equal conditions (at least, that's how it feels) but the idea of a government pretty much excludes this assumed equality

Seriously, why should I care about being fair to someone who is supposed to be inferior to me by my own definition and volition? Wouldn't it be a sadistic turn to ask for fairness in these very unfair circumstances? Regarding anonymity, I don't think it is so much an anonymity issue when you just want to move your wealth around hassle-free

Quote from: DaftAjax on October 11, 2019, 05:05:31 PM

I'm really starting to think that you don't like everything that the government requires you to do, and everything about the government trying to do to you

I can't prevent you from thinking that (but you are on your own here)