What part of my statement implies there shouldn't be due process?
This part:
The important part is the dems got baited into exposing their own crimes.
So what crimes did they commit?
I wonder why the chalkboard doesnt explain us about the Parnas and Fruman case.
Oh, you mean
these guys?
Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman are accused of using a limited liability company to make political contributions related to American elections, in violation of FEC prohibitions against contributions from foreign nationals. Both men have been linked to Giulianis efforts to conduct investigations in Ukraine.
And look...
https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2019/10/1862/1048/AP_19270560522716.jpgThere's a picture of them with this oily looking guy on the left, who is... drum roll... Donald Trump Jr.! Oooh would you look at that: the presidents son is carousing with people under investigation, who just happened to have sent money to a Trump super PAC!
But let me guess: its just more witch hunt right? And that statement is nowhere near an example of "rules for theeee but not for meeeeeeee" blatant hypocrisy, right?
So calling some one a criminal means that they don't get due process? Cool story bro. Careful not to stretch that premise any more or it will break. The Bidens as well as others are guilty of the crime of selling influence, extortion, bribery, and I am sure many other crimes that will be later defined in a court of law.
Regarding your picture... So he had a meal with these guys, clearly case closed! You certainly can't find all kinds of prominent politicians taking photos with people who later turn out to be criminals. If that is your standard of evidence we might as well get rid of the entire federal government. Did he receive personal enrichment from these guys like Hunter Biden? Did Trump offer a quid pro quo, receive direct payments, and then brag about his extortion on camera like Joe Biden?
The money they gave to the Trump PAC wasn't even used. I am also willing to bet the fact that they put it in a segregated account means they expected this and were simply baiting them so they could be prosecuted and turned to state's evidence. The sheer desperation from the left to project false equivelence upon the situation is quite pathetic.
