Quote from: TECSHARE on October 13, 2019, 01:16:01 PM

Quote from: TwitchySeal on October 13, 2019, 12:55:43 PM

You said "The Nixon impeachment was based upon the criminal Watergate incident, so yes, it was a criminal proceeding."

You can keep saying you didn't, but you did.

You probably just didn't know what a criminal proceeding was at the time, or weren't familiar with the first article of the constitution. This doesn't make you stupid - so just chill out and stop trying to insist you weren't wrong or you didn't say that. We all have eyes and a brain, you aren't fooling anyone.

I said: The Nixon impeachment was based upon the criminal Watergate incident, so yes, it was a criminal proceeding."

I did not say: "The Nixon impeachment was a criminal proceeding."

You keep repeating yourself all you like. I an not responsible for defending how you reinterpret my words, only what I actually said.

You were arguing that the Nixon impeachment proceedings were a criminal proceeding. Go back and read what you wrote dude. You said it more than once. Instead of just admitting you weren't right you're really going to try and convince us that you never said what you were saying? Even though we're on an internet forum where our posts are saved?

Look, here's another example of you not saying the Nixon Impeachment was a criminal proceeding!

Quote from: TECSHARE on October 12, 2019, 09:19:02 AM

The currently issued subpoenas have ZERO AUTHORITY under the law because they are issued OUTSIDE of this protocol, unlike the Nixon impeachment, which was a criminal proceeding, unlike the current investigation.